How to build a redirect map for a site move on a small site

A site changing domains or slugs can settle build a redirect map by doing send every old URL once. build a redirect map for a site move on a small site is a decision for a site changing domains or slugs, and the job is send every old URL to the closest new one (on a small site).

A spreadsheet of old before any tour

Put a spreadsheet of old on send every old URL before you call any of it research. If you are a site changing domains or slugs, put a spreadsheet of old and new URLs where send every old URL to the closest new one (on a small site) already happens. Do the job once. Save the version from before. You are building a comparison, not a tour of build a redirect map for a site move on a small site. Leave a catch-all redirect only for the leftovers you checked unopened. The constraint for the week is the spreadsheet, which is the project, and it does not get renegotiated on Tuesday because a feature list was interesting.

Old URLs that land on the second and third pass

Repeat the same job with new material. Two more passes is the point. The first pass is clumsy for reasons that have nothing to do with the tool. By the third pass you can see whether old URLs that land on the right page, not the homepage is moving or whether you are simply faster at fiddling.

Each pass, look once for a mass redirect of everything to the homepage. Not a full audit of the universe. One look, on the real output. If you find it, fix the output and note that the tool did not catch it. That note is part of the result.

Did old URLs that land move

Thursday is the decision, and it should fit in a few sentences. Did old URLs that land on the right page, not the homepage move? Did a mass redirect of everything to the homepage show up? Does the spreadsheet, which is the project still feel acceptable now that the work exists? If the answers are yes, yes you caught it, and yes, keep a spreadsheet of old and new URLs and stop reading about build a redirect map for a site move on a small site.

If the metric did not move, do not add a subscription. A second tool on a failed definition of the job just gives you two places to lose the draft. Either the job line is wrong, or this pick is wrong. Fix one.

A catch-all redirect only only after a real miss

Friday is for a catch-all redirect only for the leftovers you checked only if Thursday proved a real miss that the alternative is built for. Give it the same kind of pass, not a ceremonial install. If you are switching because you are restless, close the laptop and keep the first choice.

End with a date and a sentence another person could follow. “a site changing domains or slugs used a spreadsheet of old and new URLs for send every old URL to the closest new one (on a small site), watched old URLs that land on the right page, not the homepage, and kept it.” Or the honest opposite. build a redirect map for a site move on a small site does not need a longer ending than that.

One afternoon with a spreadsheet of old

I would give build a redirect map for a site move on a small site one afternoon, not a research project. a site changing domains or slugs sits down with the thing they already meant to finish, opens a spreadsheet of old and new URLs, and does send every old URL to the closest new one (on a small site) once without narrating it. The point of the afternoon is a result you can look at tomorrow, not a setup you can show someone. If the afternoon ends in a folder of screenshots and no finished piece, the tool won and the job lost.

Halfway through I would stop and read the output as if I had not made it. That is when a mass redirect of everything to the homepage shows up, if it is going to. A fresh eye is not a second product. It is the same person, ten minutes later, willing to delete a sentence. the spreadsheet, which is the project still applies. An afternoon that needs a second subscription to finish was the wrong afternoon.

Say a spreadsheet of old, then stop talking

If someone asked me in a corridor about build a redirect map for a site move on a small site, I would not send them here and hope. I would say: you are a site changing domains or slugs, the job is send every old URL to the closest new one (on a small site), start with a spreadsheet of old and new URLs, and do not touch a catch-all redirect only for the leftovers you checked until old URLs that land on the right page, not the homepage has had a chance to move. Then I would stop talking. Advice that needs a follow-up meeting is usually a list in disguise.

I would also say the quiet part. I have not timed this in a lab, and I am not going to borrow a percentage to sound precise. The useful claim is narrower. This is the choice I would make for this job, and a mass redirect of everything to the homepage is the way I would know I was wrong. A person can use a narrow claim. A round number with no method is how pages start to sound generated.

Stay with a spreadsheet of old for a second week

If the first week held, the second week is boring on purpose. Same a spreadsheet of old and new URLs. Same kind of send every old URL to the closest new one (on a small site). No new login. The only new line in the note is whether old URLs that land on the right page, not the homepage is still moving or whether the first week was beginner’s luck and a quiet calendar. Most tools look helpful in a quiet week. The second week is the one with the interruption.

This is also when the spreadsheet, which is the project either becomes normal or starts to grate. If it grates, that is information. Do not “optimize” the feeling by adding a catch-all redirect only for the leftovers you checked on top. Switch, or stay, or stop. Three states. The fourth state, a stack, is how build a redirect map for a site move on a small site turns into a part-time job about tools.

Who it is for: a site changing domains or slugs

Leave three lines for the next person: a site changing domains or slugs, a spreadsheet of old, and the date. Three lines. Who it is for: a site changing domains or slugs. What you opened: a spreadsheet of old and new URLs. What you refused: anything that depended on a mass redirect of everything to the homepage. Add the date. A note without a date becomes folklore, and folklore is how a one-week experiment turns into “the way we do build a redirect map for a site move on a small site” long after it stopped fitting.

If the colleague’s job is different, the note should say that too. a site changing domains or slugs is not everyone. I would rather they close this page and start from their own job than stretch a spreadsheet of old and new URLs over work it was not chosen for. Specific pages age better than pages that try to cover the whole shelf.

The only lines worth keeping on build a redirect map

I would cut any sentence that exists to sound complete. build a redirect map for a site move on a small site does not get truer because it mentions every nearby product. I would cut the feature tour. I would cut the origin story of the category. I would keep the job, the pick, the cost, the check, and the miss: send every old URL to the closest new one (on a small site), a spreadsheet of old and new URLs, the spreadsheet, which is the project, old URLs that land on the right page, not the homepage, a mass redirect of everything to the homepage.

Length is not the same thing as care. A long page that repeats one idea in new clothes is the page that feels machine-made, even when a person typed it. If a paragraph does not change what a site changing domains or slugs does on Monday, it can go. The pictures in this piece are there to break the scroll at the decision, not to decorate a thin argument.

Write down old URLs that land after the pass

Do the pass on real material for build a redirect map, then write down what old URLs that land did. If you have twenty minutes, do a twenty-minute slice of send every old URL to the closest new one (on a small site), not a setup that assumes a free afternoon. the spreadsheet, which is the project includes the hour. A perfect system you will not start is a luxury purchase. Then leave the setup alone until that note exists. I would keep the page only if that note is still true when you open it again next week and the job has not changed.

Write three lines when you are done. What you used. What old URLs that land on the right page, not the homepage did. What you will not repeat. That note ages better than another roundup, and it keeps build a redirect map for a site move on a small site tied to work you can remember. If the second try only looks better because nobody checked for a mass redirect of everything to the homepage, count it as a miss.